When you combine appropriate organizational structure, defined roles and responsibilities and appropriate processes that are properly linked to a mission or business model, an organization can be comfortable that it has a proper governance structure to guide its operations.
Put another way, the key elements of a governance model are:
So how is this relevant to an organization’s implementation of web-based mapping applications?
In the rapidly evolving world of technology the only thing that seems certain about the future is that it will be different from today and the degree of difference is proportional to the time scale. I would suggest this picture applies to the current state of web-based mapping technology.
For an organization considering or already engaged in the development of a web mapping application, the challenge of making choices today that remain valid tomorrow can be daunting – and particularly so if the organization does not see its strengths in the world of technology.
Is it just me or do the terms governance and technical innovation seems at opposite ends of the cool spectrum?
All too often, inadequate attention is paid to constructing an application-appropriate governance structure to ensure the long term sustainability and evolution of web-based mapping applications. My observation is that even though web mapping is a relatively young area of endeavour, many applications have a tendency to flag or grow stale over time.
The areas an appropriate governance model will touch on include:
The objective should be to strike a balance between a sufficient level of governance to provide direction without it becoming overbearing and bureaucratic.
As Kim Guenther has stated “… governance structures are most noticeable in their absence and seem invisible when working effectively.”
Spatial context is a part of our decision making but spatial information technology may not.
The recent announcement by YourStreet.com that they were discontinuing the use of maps in their hyperlocal news service is a reminder that there is nothing sacred about the application of spatial information tools in a business context. That is sometimes hard for us to imagine – at least those of us living with spatial data and technology day in and day out.
The reason cited by Directions Magazine was a financial one – maintaining the service was too costly. Assuming that is true, what does one make of it?
Should that surprise us? Not really since it pretty much is the way life goes.
In the case of Yourstreet has the importance of spatial information disappeared? I would argue that it has not given that they premise for their business revolves around local (read spatially relevant) news. Instead, YourStreet has simply determined they will not use online mapping tools as a spatial reference system to help their users. They have deemed that a descriptive spatial reference system (ie, a user defines the spatial context for news of a particular location in his or her request) is adequate for their user’s needs.
We need to be clear that spatial context is not the same as spatial information technology. The former can be achieved in a variety of ways. Technology may aid in providing spatial context but it needs to be evaluated within a cost/benefit framework appropriate to the business or organization in question.